Mike Brock: “If you were designing the perfect opposition to facilitate the consolidation of executive power—one that provides the appearance of resistance while ultimately enabling its advance—what would it look like? It would likely make forceful statements about the threats to democracy. It would marshal righteous indignation in speeches and press releases.
But when confronted with moments of consequential choice, it would invariably find reasons why resistance is too risky, too politically costly, or simply impossible.”“It would train its supporters to expect and accept defeat as the prudent choice.”
“The genius of this approach is how it transforms surrender into a form of responsibility. Those who advocate for more forceful opposition are cast as naive, reckless, or politically unsophisticated. The language of pragmatism becomes a shield against the charge of complicity.”