New York Times: “Iran is suddenly far more brittle than it was during his first administration, its leadership more uncertain, its nuclear program more exposed and vulnerable to attack. That new reality has touched off an internal debate about how his administration should approach Tehran: with an openness to negotiations, or with an attack on its nuclear enrichment program — overt or covert, or perhaps initiated by Israel.
”“Or, as many suggest, a round of ‘coercive diplomacy’ that leaves Tehran to choose either a negotiated disassembly of its nuclear capability, or a forced one.”